Reference-based screening
Search a project or compound pool from a known ligand using supported molecular, shape, color, or pharmacophore evidence.
Ligand-based screening and analog generation
Search for molecules related by 2D or 3D evidence, generate interpretable analog hypotheses, and compare each candidate with its parent before sending it into potency, ADMET, selectivity, docking, or synthesis review.
A connected series workspace
MolexIO treats a generated molecule as a proposal with a parent, transformation, and evidence trail. Similarity and generation methods are kept identifiable so chemists can distinguish a close analog, a scaffold-level hypothesis, and a distant chemical-space neighbor.
Search a project or compound pool from a known ligand using supported molecular, shape, color, or pharmacophore evidence.
Retain the operator and transformation label for R-group, bioisosteric, scaffold, growth, or related design hypotheses.
Inspect retained and changed regions with side-by-side depictions and 3D views instead of comparing unrelated orientations.
Keep measured activity distinct from predicted potency and examine how structure and endpoint changes vary across a series.
Carry selected candidates into ADMET, off-target, docking, MPO, and route assessment through the shared project identity.
Balance closeness to the seed with chemical diversity so a ranked list does not become a collection of near duplicates.
From query to candidate set
Select a chemically valid molecule and identify the known evidence and design objective.
Use 2D similarity, 3D shape, pharmacophore, or controlled generation according to the available hypothesis.
Inspect transformations, similarity, diversity, properties, and any measured or predicted activity separately.
Promote a short list into structure-based, developability, selectivity, and synthesis workflows.
Scientific boundary
Activity cliffs, stereochemistry, protonation, assay context, and target mechanism can make similar molecules behave differently. Generated structures may also be unstable, inaccessible, or outside a model's applicability domain. MolexIO preserves method, similarity, transformation, and evidence status so the result remains a hypothesis for expert and experimental review.
Questions before use
No. It is useful for finding hypotheses, but potency and selectivity must be supported by appropriate evidence.
Yes. A known molecule or series can be sufficient for ligand-based work; structural evidence can be added later.
No. They need chemical review and route or supply assessment before synthesis decisions.
Keep the reason for every proposal attached as candidates move into the next decision.